12axes-testTake the test
Issue · mostly Security

Policing

How much power should the police have?

Policing is a balance between safety and liberty. One view holds that police need strong powers, such as stopping and searching suspicious people and using tools like facial recognition, to prevent crime and protect the public. Another view holds that broad powers can be misused, fall unevenly on some groups, and wear down trust. It also asks whether money would be better spent on mental health and social services that tackle the causes of crime and disorder.

On the 12 Axes this issue moves the security axis. Giving police more power points toward the Order pole, while limiting those powers and shifting funds to social services points toward Liberty. Shifting funds also nods toward the Shared pole on welfare, and giving local communities more say over policing points toward the Local pole on structure. The issue cuts across the usual split. Some libertarian conservatives distrust police powers and surveillance, while some on the left in high-crime neighborhoods want more policing, not less. Many people hold both views at once, wanting safe streets and strong protection from abuse.

The two sides

What each side argues

More police power

  • Supporters of stronger powers argue that stop and search helps officers prevent crime before it happens.
  • Supporters say modern tools such as facial recognition help find dangerous suspects quickly.
  • Supporters believe that visible, well-resourced policing makes communities safer, especially in areas with high crime.

More limits and local say

  • Opponents argue that broad stop and search powers are often applied unevenly and damage trust between police and communities.
  • Opponents say facial recognition in public places is a form of mass surveillance that threatens privacy.
  • Opponents of current budgets say mental health care and social services can prevent crime that policing cannot solve.
In the test

4 statements on policing

  • Police should have more power to stop and search people they find suspicious.Agreeing moves you toward Order
  • Police should be allowed to use facial recognition cameras in public places.Agreeing moves you toward Order
  • Part of police budgets should be moved to social services such as mental health care.Agreeing moves you toward Liberty
  • Local communities should have more say over how they are policed.Agreeing moves you toward Local
Answer them in the test
On the record

What politicians have said and done

At each end of Security

People whose overall profile leans furthest each way on the axis this issue moves most. A lean on the axis is not a stance on this exact issue.

Liberty
Order

More security issues

Policing: questions

What does defund the police mean?

The phrase usually means moving part of police budgets to other services, such as mental health care, housing or youth programs. Supporters say these tackle root causes of crime. Critics say it risks leaving communities less safe. Some people use the phrase to mean abolishing police, but many supporters do not.

What is stop and search?

Stop and search is a police power to stop a person in public and search them for items such as weapons or drugs. Supporters say it deters and detects crime. Critics say it is used unevenly, can target certain groups, and can damage trust in the police.

Is more policing a left or right wing position?

More police powers are generally linked to the right, and limits or reallocation of funds to the left. But views vary. Many residents in high-crime areas of every political stripe want a stronger police presence. On the 12 Axes the issue mainly moves the security axis.