Who was Jomo Kenyatta?
Jomo Kenyatta was born around 1891 in Kikuyu country and wrote the anthropological study Facing Mount Kenya in London. After returning in the 1940s he led the Kenya African Union. Arrested in 1952 during the Mau Mau emergency, he was convicted in a trial that later historians regard as rigged, and was held until 1961. He led independence talks, became prime minister in 1963 and president in 1964. His government dissolved the opposition KADU party, making Kenya a one-party state. He died in office in Mombasa on 22 August 1978 and was succeeded by Daniel arap Moi.
Political views
- Became president of the Kenya African Union in 1947 and campaigned for African political rights after returning from fifteen years in London.Source: sahistory.org.za
- Was arrested in 1952 as the alleged head of the Mau Mau and imprisoned. Later accounts say he probably had nothing to do with the rebellion and call the trial rigged.Source: gcsehistory.com
- Backed a million-acre scheme, financed by Kenya and Britain, under which Africans bought former settler farms on a willing seller, willing buyer basis.Source: ebsco.com
- Encouraged settlers to stay and called on Kenyans of all races to build a new Kenya together.Source: ebsco.com
- Welcomed foreign investment, Africanized the administration and firms, and introduced free primary education and a free medical service.Source: ebsco.com
- Presided over the dissolution of the opposition KADU and was the only candidate for president at each election, a record of one-party rule.Source: sahistory.org.za
Legacy
Many Kenyans honor Kenyatta as Mzee and Father of the Nation. Admirers credit his role in the independence struggle, his reconciliation with white settlers, steady economic growth of about 7 percent a year in the first decade and free primary schooling and medical care. Critics say his government was marked by corruption and nepotism, that he became the largest landowner in the country, and that his government ended multiparty politics. His imprisonment is regarded by many historians as unjust.
