What is Integralism?
Integralism is a Catholic theory about how politics and religion should fit together. Its starting point is that human life has two goals: a good life on earth and eternal salvation. The second goal is higher, so integralists say the state must not ignore it. In their view, the political order should recognize the Catholic faith and listen to the Church on matters of the soul. They reject the liberal idea that the state should be neutral between religions. Do not confuse it with Portuguese or Brazilian Integralism, which were separate nationalist movements of the twentieth century.
Core beliefs
- Politics should aim at the common good, and that includes spiritual good.
- Worldly power ranks below spiritual power, as the body ranks below the soul.
- The state should openly honor the Catholic religion.
- A state that claims to be neutral still favors some view of the good life.
- Law should support marriage, family and traditional morals.
History
Integralists look back to a long line of papal teaching. Pope Gelasius I wrote about the two powers, priestly and royal, in 494. Boniface VIII claimed supreme authority for the pope in Unam Sanctam (1302). In the 1800s popes condemned liberal ideas of church-state separation, and Pius IX's Syllabus of Errors (1864) did so in sharp terms. Leo XIII's encyclical Immortale Dei (1885) described the right ties between the two powers. The word integrisme was first used in France and Spain for Catholics who would not accept any deal with liberal politics. In 1965 the Second Vatican Council issued Dignitatis Humanae, which defended a right to religious freedom. Most Catholics read it as the end of the confessional state. A few scholars and writers revived integralism in the 2010s, and it now has an online and academic following.
Variants
Classical integralism supports a formal union between a Catholic state and the Church. Some modern writers treat this as a distant ideal and settle for postliberal reforms in the meantime. Others use the word loosely for any politics that puts the common good over personal choice. Writers disagree on whether the teaching of Vatican II can be fitted with integralist claims. They also differ on whether the best ruler is a king, a republic or some other form.
Criticisms
Many Catholic theologians say integralism clashes with Dignitatis Humanae, and with the Church's own call for religious freedom. Liberal and secular critics say it would make non-Catholics second-class citizens and bring back religious coercion. Some conservative Catholics say it is unrealistic in mixed societies and damages the Church's good name. Integralists reply that every political system, liberalism included, imposes a view of the good, and that they are simply restating older Catholic teaching.
In practice
Catholic confessional states existed for centuries in Europe, and in the twentieth century Franco's Spain and Salazar's Portugal gave the Church a special legal place. Today integralism is mainly a school of thought, not a party program. It has fed debate among Catholic conservatives about postliberalism, the courts and religious liberty. On the 12 axes it scores at the top of Religion and Morality, and well toward Strong leader and Order, with a mixed economic profile.