Who was Patricio Aylwin?
Patricio Aylwin, a lawyer from Viña del Mar, joined the Falange Nacional in 1945 and helped found the Christian Democratic Party in 1957. He was a senator from 1965 and Senate president in 1971-1972, and he opposed Salvador Allende. He first accepted the 1973 military takeover, then turned against Augusto Pinochet. In 1988 he spoke for the No side in the plebiscite, and in December 1989 he won the presidency with 55.2 percent. He governed from March 1990 to March 1994, with Pinochet still heading the army. Aylwin died in Santiago in April 2016.
Political views
- As Senate president he helped delay the nationalization of copper by insisting that expropriations pass through a constitutional reform.Source: cidob.org
- Welcomed the 1973 coup at first, publicly rejected the dictatorship in 1976, and said in 2003 that he regretted not condemning the coup from the start.Source: cidob.org
- Favored a negotiated, non-rupturist exit from military rule, and after the 1988 plebiscite negotiated 54 constitutional reforms that voters approved in July 1989.Source: bcn.cl
- In April 1990 he created the Truth and Reconciliation Commission; its report listed 2,279 deaths and disappearances, and he asked the victims' families for forgiveness.Source: hrw.org
- Kept the free-market model of the military government but added state social policy under the banner of growth with equity.Source: cidob.org
- Worked within limits he could not remove: the 1978 amnesty law, appointed senators and Pinochet's command of the army.Source: hrw.org
- Said in 2012 that critics of the transition were ignorant of what really happened, while still calling Pinochet a dictator.Source: demdigest.org
Legacy
Admirers credit Aylwin with steering Chile back to democracy without a new break with the army, and with the first official account of the dictatorship's killings. Under him growth averaged about 6 percent a year and inflation and unemployment fell. Critics say he put stability ahead of justice. The amnesty law stood, the Rettig Report named no perpetrators and had no criminal effect, and most abuses went unpunished. His handling of the army's show of force in 1993 was called too conciliatory, and income inequality stayed very high.
