Who was Franklin Pierce?
Pierce, born in 1804, was the son of a governor of New Hampshire. He held seats in the state house, Congress and the Senate, and fought in the Mexican War as a brigadier general. The Democrats chose him as a compromise nominee in 1852, and he won by a wide margin. Just before he took office, a train wreck killed his last surviving son. In 1854 he signed the Kansas-Nebraska Act. It cancelled the Missouri Compromise line and let settlers choose on slavery, and Kansas erupted in violence. Pierce also closed the Gadsden Purchase and chased Cuba. In 1856 his party looked elsewhere.
Political views
- Gave in to Southern pressure and let slavery spread above the old 36°30' line set by the Missouri Compromise, signing the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854.Source: millercenter.org
- In Kansas he leaned to the proslavery camp. He named a governor friendly to it while free-state settlers formed their own rival government.Source: millercenter.org
- Blocked a 1854 bill to hand federal land to states for mental asylums, arguing that Congress had no such power over the states.Source: en.wikipedia.org
- Had the Fugitive Slave Act carried out in Boston in 1854. Federal troops walked Anthony Burns to a ship to take him back into slavery.Source: en.wikipedia.org
- Signed off on the Gadsden Purchase, in which Mexico received $15 million for territory useful for a southern railroad.Source: millercenter.org
- Wanted Cuba. His envoys defended that aim in the Ostend Manifesto. In 1856 he also gave recognition to William Walker's government in Nicaragua.Source: millercenter.org
Legacy
Surveys of historians usually put Pierce close to last among presidents. The Miller Center argues that the Kansas-Nebraska Act he endorsed pushed the country toward war: it broke the Whigs, split the Democrats and created the Republicans. Critics blame him for siding with slaveholders in Kansas and for enforcing the fugitive slave law in free states. His land-hungry diplomacy, the Ostend Manifesto among it, lost him Northern voters and angered Europe. Defenders say he held a steady, narrow reading of the Constitution and hoped compromise would save the Union. His asylum veto also set a barrier against federal welfare that stood until the New Deal.
