12axes-testTake the test
Issue · mostly Markets

Big Tech and monopolies

Should dominant companies be broken up?

Some companies become so large in their markets that rivals struggle to compete. Supporters of breaking them up say that dominance lets a firm set prices, copy or buy competitors, and control the platforms others depend on, so competition law should split such companies into smaller ones. Opponents say size can come from being useful, that big firms can deliver low prices and free services, and that breaking them up is blunt, slow and could harm customers and innovation.

On the 12 Axes this issue sits mainly on the markets axis. Wanting the state to break up dominant firms points toward the Planned pole, because it accepts strong intervention. Trusting competition to correct itself points toward the Free pole. What makes the issue interesting is that it cuts across the usual divide. Some free-market thinkers want strong action because monopolies are the enemy of real competition, and some on the left want it for fairness and democratic reasons. On the other side, some conservatives worry about tech power over speech, while others defend business freedom. Both camps often agree that concentrated power is a problem and disagree on the remedy.

The two sides

What each side argues

Break them up

  • Supporters argue that dominant firms can crush rivals, so splitting them restores competition.
  • Supporters say a handful of companies hold too much power over information, commerce and public debate.
  • Supporters believe smaller firms would give consumers more choice and give startups a real chance to grow.

Leave them alone

  • Opponents argue that large firms often win by offering better products and lower prices.
  • Opponents say breaking up a company is slow, costly and unpredictable, and may harm services people rely on.
  • Opponents believe that new competitors tend to emerge on their own, and that heavy intervention could discourage investment.
In the test

The statement on big tech and monopolies

  • The government should break up large companies that dominate their markets.Agreeing moves you toward Planned
Answer them in the test

At each end of Markets

People whose overall profile leans furthest each way on the axis this issue moves most. A lean on the axis is not a stance on this exact issue.

More markets issues

Big Tech and monopolies: questions

What is a monopoly?

A monopoly is a firm that dominates a market so completely that customers have few or no alternatives. Monopoly power can allow higher prices, lower quality or the blocking of competitors. Governments often use competition or antitrust law to limit it, sometimes by forcing a company to split.

What does breaking up a company mean?

Breaking up a company means a court or regulator forces it to separate into smaller, independent businesses. The aim is to restore competition by stopping one firm from owning both a platform and the products that depend on it. It is rare and highly contested.

Is breaking up Big Tech left or right wing?

Both sides have supported it for different reasons. Some on the left want to limit corporate power, and some free-market conservatives want to defend real competition. Others on each side oppose it. On the 12 Axes it mainly moves the markets axis.