12axes-testTake the test

Mercantilism

Also called: Mercantile system · Neomercantilism · Colbertism · Bullionism

Mercantilism is the older belief that a nation grows strong by selling more than it buys, guarding its own industry and holding colonies under state control.

Mercantilism on 12 axes-100 to +100
ECONOMYSTATESOCIETYWORLDOwnershipMarketsWelfareAuthoritySecurityStructureMoralityReligionTechnologyCultureTradeForeign
Where it stands

Mercantilism, axis by axis

  1. PublicPrivate

    States relied on private merchants but gave them monopolies and charters, so the mix is private ownership with heavy state privilege.

  2. PlannedFree
  3. SharedSelf-reliant
  4. DemocraticStrong leader

    Mercantilism arose under absolute kings and also in parliamentary England and the Dutch Republic, so it points to a strong state more than any one form of government.

  5. LibertyOrder
  6. LocalCentral
  7. ProgressiveTraditional

    The social and religious scores mirror the early modern societies in which mercantilism was practised, and not a moral programme of its own.

  8. SecularReligious
  9. EmbraceCaution
  10. MulticulturalNational identity
  11. GlobalProtected
  12. CooperationStrength

What is Mercantilism?

Between the 1500s and the late 1700s, most European governments saw trade as a contest. The world's wealth, they thought, was fixed, so one nation could only gain at another's cost. Wealth was often counted in gold and silver. The aim was to export more than you import, so that bullion flowed in. To do that, states put taxes on foreign goods, backed home industries, gave trading monopolies to favoured companies and kept colonies as sources of cheap materials. Mercantilism was less a written doctrine than a set of habits shared by rulers and merchants. The name itself was popularised by its critic Adam Smith.

Core beliefs

  • A state's wealth and its military power support each other.
  • A country should sell abroad more than it buys.
  • Stocks of gold and silver are a sign of national strength.
  • Government should shield home industry with tariffs, bans and subsidies.
  • Colonies exist to serve the home country's economy.
  • Trade between nations is a rivalry in which one side's gain is the other's loss.

History

As kings built stronger states after 1500, they needed money for armies and navies. Trade with the Americas and Asia opened new sources. Early writers focused on hoarding bullion. In England, Thomas Mun's England's Treasure by Forraign Trade, published in 1664, argued that what mattered was the balance of all trade, not holding coins. Rulers also handed trade monopolies to joint-stock firms. The English East India Company dates from 1600 and the Dutch one from 1602. Jean-Baptiste Colbert, who served Louis XIV, built state factories and raised tariffs in France. A Navigation Act passed in England in 1651 reserved much shipping for English vessels. In German lands, a related tradition of state management was known as cameralism. Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations, published in 1776, argued against the whole approach. Britain dropped the Corn Laws in 1846 and the Navigation Acts in 1849.

Variants

Historians describe several versions. Bullionism, the earliest, was about piling up precious metals. The balance-of-trade view came later and looked at overall flows of goods. Colbertism meant strong state direction of industry and quality. Cameralism put weight on good administration and public finance. In the twentieth century, writers coined neomercantilism for modern policies such as export subsidies, managed exchange rates or reserve building, which aim for long-term surpluses.

Criticisms

For Adam Smith, a country is rich because of what it makes, not what it stores, and open trade lets both sides gain by specialising. David Hume noted that if a country gains bullion, prices rise and its trade advantage fades. Historians tie it to trade wars and colonial conflicts between European powers. It also fed the harsh treatment of colonial peoples, and the Atlantic slave trade that stocked plantations with enslaved Africans. Critics also say monopolies gave privileges to the well connected at the expense of consumers.

In practice

The policy shaped the empires of Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands, France and Britain. British limits on colonial trade were among the grievances that fed the American Revolution. Today the word is mainly used as a label for modern export-led strategies and for debates about tariffs and protecting key industries. Few governments accept the name. On the 12 axes the model scores strongly toward Protected on Trade and Strength on Foreign policy, with a lean toward Planned on Markets and Central on Structure.

How close are you to Mercantilism?

Answer the 12 Axes test and see your match with Mercantilism and 120+ other ideologies, axis by axis.

Take the test

Mercantilism: questions

Mercantilism vs capitalism: what is the difference?

Mercantilism treats the economy as a tool of state power and uses controls and monopolies. Capitalism relies on private ownership and competition, ideally with limited state interference. The two overlapped in practice, since mercantilist states relied on private merchants.

Why did Adam Smith criticise mercantilism?

He argued that wealth comes from production and that free trade lets every country gain through specialisation. He also thought that monopolies and trade limits favoured merchants at the expense of ordinary buyers.

Does mercantilism still exist today?

Few governments use the label, but some critics apply it to policies that chase trade surpluses or protect home industries. Defenders prefer terms such as industrial policy or economic security.

Further reading