Who was William Wilberforce?
William Wilberforce came from Hull, where his father was a rich merchant, and was born in 1759. His time at Cambridge brought a lasting friendship with the future prime minister William Pitt the Younger. Hull elected him to Parliament at 21, and in 1784 he took the larger seat of Yorkshire. An evangelical conversion in 1785 changed his aims. By 1787 he saw his calling as ending the slave trade and cleaning up the nation's morals. With Thomas Clarkson and the Clapham Sect he put forward a first abolition bill in 1791. Repeated defeats followed, and the Slave Trade Act only passed in 1807. He then supported full emancipation, gave up his seat in 1825 and died in July 1833, just after MPs approved ending slavery across most of the Empire.
Political views
- He was the leading voice in the Commons against the British slave trade, which was outlawed by the 1807 Act.Source: bbc.co.uk
- By 1823 he was calling slavery a national crime and saying that full emancipation was a moral duty.Source: en.wikipedia.org
- He helped start moral reform groups, such as one to suppress vice and another to promote stricter observance of Sunday.Source: bbc.co.uk
- He pushed to have Christian missionaries admitted to British India.Source: bbc.co.uk
- In domestic politics he defended a 1799 law aimed at trade unions and accepted the Six Acts of 1819, which curbed public meetings.Source: en.wikipedia.org
- He built public support through petitions, pamphlets and religious magazines, methods that later became routine in British politics.Source: ebsco.com
Legacy
The anti-slavery cause had no more famous voice in Parliament than Wilberforce, and he rests in Westminster Abbey. Admirers see an example of reform driven by faith. They add that he also backed better prisons, kinder treatment of animals and schools for the poor. Critics of his own time, among them William Cobbett and William Hazlitt, charged him with caring about enslaved people far away while backing the repression of workers and radicals in Britain. Some later historians, such as Eric Williams, held that economic change did more than moral campaigning to end the trade. His sons' biography has also been faulted for downplaying the role of Thomas Clarkson.
